Maybe it's obvious, but it occured to me yesterday while working on a rumours table for my current campaign: make your rumours assertive. "A dragon landed north of the town last sunday", not "some people claim they saw a dragon landing north of the town." It may be true, or false, or anywhere in between, and it may come from any source; let the players investigate if they want more info.

@nono as an in-between, maybe say where the rumours are coming from. city guardsmen, farmers, local street kids, and late-night tavern dwellers would all suggest different levels of believability

@Garrison Yes, good point. I might add this info to the table as-is.


My take is that as DM, you need to know the assertive truth. Was there a dragon or not? And then you also could note what the lore tidbit is. “Mershy and Harrioph claim they saw a dragon landing north of the town.” It’s nice because then the players can go see M&H or they can go directly north.

I’ve been experimenting with the “can come from any source” bit, not sure if I absolutely hate it or if it’s OK, buuuuut you as DM need to know if it’s true or false. There are false rumors in my system, completely bogus statements. They often lead to bad gameplay so be careful.

@Sandra Oh, I do know what is true and what is not. Actually even most false rumours may lead to other hidden facts if investigated. My point is, when you hear something from the neighboring table at the pub, it usually is presented as fact.

Regarding Mershy and Harrioph, this is not exactly the same as the "some people" in my first post. In my current campaign I tend to let the players ask "who said that" or "who saw that" but I might give them the info along with the rumour.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Tabletop Social

We are an inclusive Mastodon community for everything tabletop (and more).