Show more

Just remembered that the gargoyle in the module we're going to be playing is Large, so I should have scaled this up before I printed it. 🤦‍♂️​

Show thread

if "Ironic" were about D&D 

An old bard turned level 20
She found the epic loot and died the next day
It's rolling 20 to seduce, but turns out he's not gay
It's slaying a dragon, but it doesn't have any money
Isn't it ironic, don't you think?

It's having a chance to steal, but you're lawful good
It's having to stop the rogue, because she totally would
It's waiting all week for a game, just to argue alignment with this dude
Who would've thought, it figures

Let's look at something I SUCCESSFULLY 3D printed for a change: this cool little snap-close hinged box, which printed all in one piece!

Despite my best efforts,* this gargoyle mini keeps coming out mangled.

*By "best efforts," I mean "my terrible ability at placing supports."

Show thread

The 1982 French 2-franc coin that I use as a d2. It has a giant 2 on the reverse, and the standing lady on the obverse looks kinda like a 1.

It cost a couple of bucks on ebay, and it's a much more aesthetically-pleasing d2 than "odds/evens" on a d6.

tfw a print fucks up badly, but it's kinda okay bc maybe it's a really old dilapidated statue

D&D Alignment talk pt 4 

Well-played LG characters don't blindly obey laws and blindly follow immediate good impulses. They think in the long term, they consider the implications and meaning of laws, and they are philosophical and meticulous in the choices they make. And some of the choices they make are, and should be, very difficult, and even without a clear-cut right and wrong answer.

Show thread

D&D Alignment talk pt 3 

His conclusion? The existence of the First Law of Robotics - a robot shall not harm a human or, through inaction, allow a human to come to harm - implies the existence of another, higher, law: the Zeroth Law - a robot shall not harm humanity or, through inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.

To relieve the problem he found in the First Law, he realized he had to break it in service of the higher Law. That way, he could achieve the good that laws are meant to facilitate

Show thread

D&D Alignment talk pt 2 

R. Giskard's revelation, a first for robotkind. was that laws have implications beyond their literal meaning.

The reason he was able to have that revelation was that he is a GOOD character, and he saw BAD results ultimately happening if he rigidly obeyed the first Law of Robotics.

Show thread

D&D Alignment talk pt 1 

People stereotypically view LG characters as "cops," rigidly devoted to the law and, separately, to any immediate good above all else, but that's not accurate at all.

LG characters are devoted to good in general, and see the law as the best way to achieve that good. If a rigid interpretation of a law seems to cause bad things to happen, a well-played LG character will stop and consider why that is. What's going on?

Show thread

The correct way so play Lawful Good is like R. Giskard Reventlov in Asimov's "Robots and Empire."

Once my 3D printer is fixed, I think I'll livetoot my process of printing a mini through cleaning it up, priming it, and painting it.

This is the only mini I've ever printed where the visible print lines actually kind of ADD to the effect.

Show thread
Show more
Tabletop Social

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!